The Three Hypotheticals

Volshebny
8 min readJun 14, 2022

Last night I had a dream. If I had a more archaic belief system, I would probably even tell you that something was revealed to me in that dream. However, I think I now understand why people say that. See, I have had this situation occur enough times in my life that I can recount exactly what occurred. I had a dream and within that dream I saw people or things that got me thinking. Upon reflection as I lie there awake, I think about what I saw in my dream — I try to rationalize what I saw in my dream — and it’s actually then (when I’m lying there awake) that I truly had my epiphany. I was so close to sleep, perhaps it could be mistaken as sleep. I don’t know. Perhaps!

First hypothetical: WHAT IF QUEEN ELIZABETH IS ILLEGITIMATE?

What if there were a corrupt syndicate that knew this? What would the royal family be willing to do to secure this secret? What if I told you that there is evidence to suggest this to be true? What if I told you that Edward IV was most likely illegitimate? That would mean the entire Tudor Line was also illegitimate. It would also explain why the English monarchs distanced themselves from the Vatican and created the Church of England because the Vatican almost certainly knew. It could also go a long way to explain many things — including Edward VIII’s abdication of the throne in 1937. What if he refused to go along with the WWII narrative? If he wouldn’t endorse a war with his cousins, just get rid of him.

Second hypothetical: WHY CAN’T WE ASK SOME PEOPLE TO CLEAN UP THEIR ACT?

The “some people” are the Dutch, the Germans, the English and the Israelis. Most of the world industrialized in the 20th Century. What if the people who financed our industrial revolutions had an agenda? How come I can turn to the Russians and ask, “Would you clean up your act?” and no one complains about that being racially motivated? I can turn to the Japanese, Chinese, Italians and Americans and ask them the same thing. The World Wars did help decimate the numbers of the Italian Cosa Nostra, the Chinese Triad, and the Japanese Yakuza. Additionally, however, the Russians and the Chinese endured Communist Revolutions around the same time. These revolutions are perhaps the leading reasons these two countries experienced such an extensive and complete decimation of their organized crime syndicates. You may think such a suggestion ludicrous. The suggestion that the Russian Bratva is weak may seem silly to some, but honestly there is much confusion surrounding the Russian mob. I won’t clarify it here, but I’ve spoken about it extensively in various articles — but Sergei Mogilevich isn’t Russian.

How come no one ever talks about a Dutch, German, or English mob? How would I render any such discussion mute? An organized crime syndicate or even a cartel is a conspiracy. Respectively, they are either crime families or business interests conspiring to maximize opportunities and/or profits for themselves at the expense of everyone else. They are both forms of a monopoly. They are both a means of control. They are both a means of monopolization of a community’s resources. Remember, a “community” can be defined as a group of people who share resources. What if true “globalism” is seeing the world as a global community? Well, then the actors who participate in a control — a monopolization — of those resources are acting on self-interests… on selfishness… on greed. Economic power is political power. Money can buy influence. It is said that everyone has a price. Sadly, that’s true. If you truly wish to avoid this monopolization in the future — minimize the role of money within the community. We all will prostitute ourselves — maybe not literally — but figuratively, we will all compromise our principles if our very survival is the alternative.

However, why can’t I turn to the Israelis and ask them to clean up their act? You know the answer to that. In America, no one is allowed to criticize Israel. I can criticize the president, but I better not criticize Israel or risk character assassination or worse. They are the only demographic on the planet that actually have words that exclusively refer to “discrimination against us.” One such word is “pogrom.” It comes from Russian, but it has entered the English vernacular. It is known as “an organized persecution or extermination of an ethnic group, especially of Jews.” Another such word is ‘anti-Semite” (or “anti-Semitic”). It’s simply defined as “hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism.” Unfortunately, this word is abused to such a degree that any criticism — *any* criticism — is often labeled “Antisemitic” by the world’s establishment media. The state of Israel has been able to evade much scrutiny as a result. For example, if American, the USS Liberty incident alone should alarm you. If any other country had done what the Israelis did on June 8th, 1967, America would’ve reacted militarily, and rightly so.

Who financed the world’s industrial revolutions?

Third hypothetical: WHAT WOULD THE WORLD LOOK LIKE IF WE ABANDONED OUR ELECTRIC GRID?

This hypothetical is actually the one that came from my dream. Many of you know me as a proponent for the ITER Project. The ITER Project is a multi-billion dollar tokamak reactor that allegedly would be the world’s first nuclear fusion reactor. All nuclear reactors to date are fission reactors (splitting atoms), but fusion reactors get their name from the fact that they are literally fusing atoms together — like the process occurring in our Sun. The component that provides energy — regardless of the energy source — is actually the Hydrogen within the fuel. The theory suggests that ocean water could become the fuel source. This could perpetuate our grid system forever. We would also reap the benefits of less toxic byproducts as a result of the energy production making it better for the environment. It is seen as a Win-Win situation… or prospective situation. Of course, it wouldn’t jeopardize their monopoly — only reinforce it.

The competition between Nicola Tesla and Thomas Edison is stuff of legend. The War of Currents — Alternating Current versus Direct Current — is still talked about today. Although Thomas Edison resulted to dirty tricks in his attempt to win the War of Currents, Nicola Tesla still won. However, Nikola Tesla was not finished with his research. He dreamed of free energy. However, the Capitalists who financed his research pulled the plug — pardon the pun — on his research because if they couldn’t profit from it, why bother? If they couldn’t put a meter on it and charge for it, they had no interest. What would the world look like today if Nicola Tesla was allowed to continue with his research unfettered? What was Tesla attempting to tell the world with his cryptic 3–6–9 comments? Was he alluding to Vortex Math?

What if scientists like Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson are correct? What if this is not our first attempt at civilization, but our tenth or twentieth? What if even human civilization’s history was more cyclical? If true, what if our present civilization is one of the only human civilizations to have bypassed free energy? We acknowledge that wind currents and water currents have some pretty spectacular capabilities. What if electrical currents also have spectacular capabilities? The word “electromagnetic” comes from the recognition that magnetism and electricity are practically synonymous. They can both be described as a flow of electrons. What if we were only revealing the tip of the iceberg when Tesla concluded his research? Is it possible Larry Fullerton, another prestigious American inventor of the 20th Century, could have been onto something when he alluded to magnetic fields acting like “waves”? Larry Fullerton was the inventor of programmable magnets, and a cofounder of Correlated Magnetics Research (CMR). What if electric currents (waves) are substantially more robust than previously imagined? We witness lightning streak back down to Earth in a frightening display of power. What if ionization occurs more often and more abundantly than previously thought? Could this be the basis for levitation or using electric ions to serve as some form of counterweight? How did ancient builders move such massive foundation blocks that we find under many ancient structures? (e.g., Egyptian pyramids and Sphinx, the Temple Mount, etc.) Many of these foundation blocks fall into the range of 500 tons — 2,000 tons.

What if this world we’ve created for ourselves is one of folly? What if the vaunted ITER Project where we envision capturing the power of the Sun here on Earth is also folly? What if free energy is possible? What if free energy was not only possible, but was the answer to protecting the environment? I don’t know if it is possible or not. I don’t claim to have any forbidden knowledge about this topic. Like I said, I just awoke from a dream and had these thoughts buzzing around in my head. It probably doesn’t amount to anything, but I just thought I’d share these with you.

Larry Kudlow was quoted recently as saying, “There is probably no way out of this.” What he was referring to was the complete and utter collapse of American Capitalism. Could those people who are helping awaken the masses also be allowing this absolute and worldwide (universal) collapse of the American Capitalist model? (i.e., the collapse of the Anglo-American Empire)? The modern world that we have constructed for ourselves is only about a century old. Unfortunately, that’s also about the time they seized absolute influence over the American Elite. With bribes of lucrative business deals, political power, racially-motivated ideologies which appealed to people’s vanity and pretentious self-worth (the reason peer-pressure is a real problem, not just imagined); but also blackmail as a means to coerce people who wouldn’t otherwise acquiesce. Remember, we’re speaking of war-profiteers. We’re talking dregs of society seizing control. Who else could/would advocate for war when peace were possible? …Dregs! Scum! Thugs!

Although we may have all been duped by their chicanery, there are reasons to be hopeful about the future. If you truly value your freedom, then a holistic approach is the most equitable way of maintaining/achieving it. America is not alone in this. Neither is China or Russia or France or anyone else. We finally have an opportunity to bring the world together in a meaningful and orderly manner. Let’s not miss this opportunity. We should all be making efforts to talk with one another and try to find common ground. We need to be as conciliatory as possible, but we also need to come to terms with our past and try to prudently and equitably punish wrongdoers for their crimes. Many of our neighbors were caught up in a bad system. This was a systemic problem. The system encouraged people to think and act the way they did. If possible, we need to reconcile with as many of our neighbors as ethically possible. “Where we go one, we go all.” This phrase captures our present predicament. If our species is worth saving, we’ll need to act together.

--

--

Volshebny

A simple boy from the rural areas of upstate South Carolina. I've gotten around a bit. I've lived in various countries and seen many things.