For those of you who’ve asked, I told you, “They will allow a PSYOP to execute. This PSYOP was planned regardless who won the 2016 election. Donald J. Trump won the 2016 election so now the Patriots are in control.”
If you wondered as I did, “Why allow this insanity to transpire?” Well, it took me some time to figure it out for myself, but here’s why — to teach people CRITICAL THINKING/ANALYSIS skills. This is what I mean:
A PSYOP — which COVID-19 is — a PSYchological OPeration (a part of Information Warfare) … they are based on pseudoscience, not science. They (the victims) are made delusional due to being fed erroneous information which builds an ideology (an idea of how the world around them is truly functioning), but the trusted source betrayed them/us. The science (i.e. the facts, empirical evidence, or truth) is what we offer to replace their delusional ideology.
Additionally, we’ve talked about how people build their belief systems. It takes time. It usually involves a network of trusted sources, and people compare/contrast what data they are exposed to every day. They both compare and contrast all data encountered to see if it will FIT INTO their existing belief system (or paradigm). If it fits into that paradigm (i.e. “belief system”) then they readily accept it. If it does NOT, they reject it. However, a third option is also possible, if the source is a trusted source, people will go through mental gymnastics to make that new data fit into their existing belief system. (These mental gymnastics are the result of Cognitive Dissonance. “Mama says the sky is blue, but x says the sky is green… maybe it’s aqua.” You get the point.)
How then to overcome Cognitive Dissonance? Use science to discuss the topic with friends and relatives who have opposing views (the naysayers). Explain to them the difference between SCIENCE and PSEUDOSCIENCE. Pseudoscience is based on presumptions, biases, ideology. How can you have an honest debate when your opponent is making presumptions that give them an allegorical head start in any debate/dialogue. They presume the MODELS are accurate. When COVID came out…. sure… precaution was warranted. However, the DATA has proven the models to be inaccurate and full of erroneous predictions. It takes time. Treat them with kids’ gloves.
The problem is that MSM passes off “scientific modeling” as “scientific data” but they’re NOT the same thing. That presumption that the models are accurate is DRIVEN by MSM. They want to perpetuate that presumption, so they disallow people from hearing the data. Give it time. There will come a time when people will say that it was obvious. As advocates of truth, we have time on our side. We will overcome this madness and our Republic will be better as a result. This is our crucible.
· Concerning COVID-19, you will find that the presented models were full of erroneous predictions like millions more would die from the virus than those who truly succumbed to the virus. After researching and digging for truth, you will find that the data disproves the extreme virulence of the disease and that it isn’t much worse than the typical influenza.
· Concerning Russiagate, you will find that America’s esteemed law enforcement agency — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) — were operating under a dual standard. American people and patriots were subjected to one standard and the Deep State and their cronies were essentially exempt from the law. Their Russiagate model that they fabricated with the fictitious Steele dossier and a disinformation campaign (i.e. pseudoscience) that was so elaborate and deceitful that it seems surreal to most that people could resort to such cruelty. LTG Michael Flynn will be vindicated.
· Concerning 9–11–2001, you will find that the presented models from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and various mainstream media outlets (e.g. Popular Mechanics, National Geographic, etc.) were full of erroneous and fraudulent claims — many of which defy the laws of physics. The multitude of presumptions they made to explain the Twin Towers catastrophic failures from that fateful date, were juvenile and flawed. After researching the topic, you will realize that the columns of the World Trade Center (WTC) should have remained standing because neither the “pancake theory” nor the “power-driver theory” explains the failure of these vertical columns adequately.
· Concerning Global Warming, you will find that the presented models were full of erroneous predictions regarding global warming/climate change. After researching the topic, you will discover that every prediction ever made by the catastrophic anthropogenic climate change advocates, not even one has come true. Which is amazing considering that they started making their erroneous predictions almost a century ago (1923–2020). Again, the data will prove the models incorrect.
· Concerning Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism, you will find that the presumption of the existence of god (a deity) has led most of humanity to freely accept the dogma and propaganda of ancient Rome. Based on this ideology that there must be a sentient being that designed everything, both narratives (i.e. models), Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity, are seriously flawed and assign emotional traits to the deity to “explain away” these flaws. Before I continue, I just wanted to express a defense of these teachings. The ideology espoused by Christians has evolved over time. Once, the masses were able to interpret the Scriptures for themselves, you will notice that Christianity evolved. The ideology became less belligerent and more benevolent and benign. After researching the topic, you will reach the uneasy conclusion that the data suggests that both Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity were created to control the Roman citizens of the First Century. The Flavian family allied with other Elitists of the day to create these religions and thereby retain control of their empire. Islam, of course, came centuries later, and relies heavily upon the others for its narrative.